iVoox Podcast & Radio

Episode 99: Power (guest Lisa Heinzerling)

27/05/2016
7
0
0

Audio not available. Try it later.

Preparing audio to download.

Sponsored listening. Audio will begin within seconds...

Escucha sin esperas

Hazte Premium

Episode 99: Power (guest Lisa Heinzerling) description

Joe is at the airport for a special pre-roll segment. Then we say hello to Lisa Heinzerling, administrative law expert (5:23). After a substantive and goofy discussion of legislation and regulation courses (6:29), we discuss the development of what Lisa calls “the power canons” resulting from recent decisions of the Supreme Court (10:39). If you’re Congress, how do you write a statute meant to solve problems that might evolve in type or degree? Do you have the power to do so, or are you limited to speaking to the here and now? Does the Supreme Court have the power to limit legislative and regulatory power in this way? Download | iTunes | RSS Feed | Email This show’s links: Lisa Heinzerling’s faculty profile (including links to all her scholarship) Lisa Heinzerling and Mark Tushnet, The Regulatory and Administrative State (a legislation and regulation casebook) Lisa Heinzerling, The Power Canons Oral Argument 23: Rex Sunstein? (guest Ethan Leib) City of Arlington v. FCC (C.J. Roberts in dissent: “It would be a bit much to describe the result as ‘the very definition of tyranny,’ but the danger posed by the growing power of the administrative state cannot be dismissed.”) NCTA v. Brand X Richard Posner, The Incoherence of Antonin Scalia Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA (“permits for stationary sources of greenhouse gases once those air pollutants were regulated under a separate provision of the Act, addressing mobile sources.”) (clear statement required when “an agency claims to discover in a long-extant statute an unheralded power to regulate "a significant portion of the American economy,”) -citing brown and williamson King v. Burwell; see also Oral Argument X about King; but here isn’t there some reason - for unknowing ambiguities where there was a failed intention to resolve legislatively a huge issue… seems bound up in the merits Michigan v. EPA (“reasonable and necessary” mandates cost consideration by agency — normative bc now congress must avoid such language to avoid some kind of CBA) lower courts: MetLife v. Financial Stability Oversight Council; Independent Pilots Association v. Federal Aviation Administration Lisa Heinzerling, Inside EPA: A Former Insider's Reflections on the Relationship Between the Obama EPA and the Obama White House Oral Argument 28: A Wonderful Catastrophe (our Erie show)

law regulation school legal theory legislation interpretation administrative

Comments

Por decisión del propietario, no se aceptan comentarios anónimos. Regístrate en iVoox para comentarlo.

Es un programa de entretenimiento de lo desconocido, insólito y sobrenatural, casos sorprendentes sin explicación lógica. Investigación, reportajes, entrevistas y análisis de las evidencias del más allá.

Antena Historia

Este es un canal de PodCast dedicado a divulgar la Historia general, militar, social y política. En nuestros programas trataremos hechos poco conocidos del pasado. Únete y síguenos en: https://antenahistoria.com/ info@antenahistoria.com Fac... ebook y Twitter

La Tortulia Podcast: Episodios

La Tortulia no es un podcast de historia más. Nuestro ángulo siempre está enfocado a lo dramático lo hilarante o muchas veces ambas cosas. Divulgamos de forma amena, para que escuches cosas interesantes a la vez que descubras cosas nuevas. ¡Bienvenidos!

Casus Belli Podcast Historia

Vive la Historia Bélica del Siglo XX Podcast de Historia donde te hablamos de las batallas, las estrategias, la geopolítica, los personajes, o las armas más importantes de los conflictos contemporáneos.