
Podcast
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
66
0
Recognized as Canada’s leading law school, Queen’s Law is an academic community dedicated to excellence in legal research and scholarship. The QLaw Pod is a discussion of current legal topics and current events and how they impact the laws in Canada.
#queenslaw
Recognized as Canada’s leading law school, Queen’s Law is an academic community dedicated to excellence in legal research and scholarship. The QLaw Pod is a discussion of current legal topics and current events and how they impact the laws in Canada.
#queenslaw
Qlaw Pod - Episode 60 - Suing City Hall: Class Actions as Private Enforcement of Local Governments
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
Title: Suing City Hall: Class Actions as Private Enforcement of Local Governments
Date: Monday, March 23, 2026
Description: Using data from Israel, this study examines the scope and effectiveness of class actions filed against local governments. The researchers analyzed about 2,000 cases, coding key details such as subject matter, outcomes and remedies. The findings show class actions can strengthen oversight of local governments, while also identifying ways to reduce misuse of the process by plaintiffs’ lawyers.
Speakers:
Omer Kimhi - Professor of Law, Faculty of Law, Haifa University
42:21
Qlaw Pod - Episode 59 - Anti-Palestinian Racism
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
Title: Upside Down: Anti-Palestinian Racism, Judicial Bias, and Inverted Racial Power
Date: Monday, March 16, 2026
Description: This paper wrestles with the contradiction of legal objectivity/subjectivity using the case study of the bias complaint against Justice Spiro for his interference in the hiring of a scholar at the University of Toronto who applied international law to Israel. We trace the meaning of judicial bias from the Court’s leading decision (RDS) to its citation by B’nai Brith of Canada League for Human Rights (B’nai Brith) in its successful intervention before the Federal Court in Justice Spiro’s case. Whereas RDS conceived of bias as permitting (rare) judicial anti-racism, B’nai Brith, the Canadian Judicial Council, and the Federal Court all conceived bias as, in effect, permitting judicial racism—what we term an “upside down” analysis premised on Zionist subjectivity.
Speakers:
Joshua Sealy-Harrington - Associate Professor & Chair in Palestinian Human Rights in Canada
51:05
Qlaw Pod - Episode 58 -Reimagining Democratic Rights - Justice Colin C.J. Feasby
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
Title: Reimagining Democratic Rights
Date: Monday, March 2, 2026
Description: Democratic rights are the most important rights in the Charter because they are what restrains authoritarianism; they are exempted from the Notwithstanding Clause so that democracy cannot be legislated out of existence. Justice Feasby will argue in this presentation that our democratic rights jurisprudence is based on historical fiction, lacks a coherent political theory, and uses a Charter interpretive methodology that is anomalous. The Supreme Court of Canada’s substitution of fuzzy derivative rights like “effective representation” and “meaningful participation” for the actual rights provided for in Charter s 3 insulates limits on democratic rights from genuine scrutiny and leaves democracy vulnerable to abuse. He will propose a new approach to the Charter s 3 rights to vote and to stand for election. Justice Feasby contends that democracy would be better protected by a modest approach to Charter s 3 that hews closer to the constitutional text and recognizes the purpose of democratic rights as only to be protection for the minimal conditions of democracy.
Justice Colin C.J. Feasby graduated from the University of Alberta Faculty of Law in 1998. He later attended Columbia University where he earned an LL.M and J.S.D. He practiced at Osler for over 20 years, serving the Managing Partner of the Calgary Office for four years. As a lawyer, Justice Feasby had an active trial and appellate practice acting for corporate clients as well as a significant pro bono public interest practice. He appeared before many courts across the country, including the Supreme Court of Canada several times. He has written extensively on constitutional law subjects, particularly concerning democracy issues. He was appointed Queen’s Counsel in 2020 and then to the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta in 2021. In his time as a justice, he has written many significant decisions including concerning the rights of family members to intervene in patient decisions about Medical Assistance in Dying, the constitutionality of changes to Alberta regulations governing opioid prescription, the constitutionality of the Alberta Personal Information Protection Act, and whether a referendum on the independence of Alberta from Canada contravenes Charter and Treaty rights.
Speakers:
Justice Colin C.J. Feasby
40:23
Qlaw Pod - Episode 57 -Making Disability Rights a Reality - Honouring the Legal Rights of the Minority of Everyone
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
Title: Making Disability Rights a Reality - Honouring the Legal Rights of the Minority of Everyone
Date: Monday, February 23, 2026
Description: Mr. Lepofsky visits Queen’s University as a Visiting Professor of Disability Rights bringing extensive knowledge that spans a wide range of legal areas including Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, Tort Law, Contracts, Property Law, Labour Law, Employment Law, Human Rights Law, and criminal appeals. He holds an LLB from Osgoode Hall Law School, an LL.M from Harvard Law School, and several honorary doctorates. He chairs the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act Alliance and has held key leadership roles advocating for disability rights across multiple sectors..
Speakers:
David Lepofsky - Visiting Professor of Disability Rights
56:32
Qlaw Pod - Episode 56 -Universal: Renewing Human Rights in a Fractured World - Alex Neve
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
Title: Universal: Renewing Human Rights in a Fractured World
Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2026
Description: The world is facing a deepening climate crisis, the legacy of genocide and mass atrocities, and a rise in hate and division. There is an urgent need to renew the promise of universal human rights, both in our communities and globally.
Alex Neve’s 2025 CBC Massey Lectures examine that challenge, highlighting the importance of people power and solidarity. In this talk, Neve will outline the themes of the lectures, including the fractured state of the world, the importance of universality and a hopeful path forward.
Speakers:
Alex Neve - Professor of international human rights, University of Ottawa; and 2025 CBC Massey Lecturer
54:39
Qlaw Pod - Episode 55 -Constitutional Silence, Section 36 and Public Services on Indian Reserves
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
Title: Constitutional Silence, Section 36 and Public Services on Indian Reserves
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2026
Description: Canada’s long-delayed legal reckoning with unequal public services on Indian reserves is only beginning. This article has two main parts. First, it examines why courts have largely avoided the constitutional questions raised by decades of inadequate services on reserves. That silence is striking, given the persistence and scale of the problem.
Second, it argues that Section 36 of the Constitution Act, 1982 should play a central role in that debate. Section 36 calls for “reasonably comparable services” and “essential public services of reasonable quality” for all Canadians. Yet Indian reserves have effectively been excluded from equalization, a gap that has allowed inequality to persist.
The article proposes treating Section 36 as a set of directive principles — not directly enforceable rights, but more than political promises — to guide courts and governments. Although no Canadian judge has yet used Section 36 this way, it offers a promising tool for addressing long-standing inequities.
Speakers:
Andrew Stobo Sniderman - PhD Cand., Harvard Law School & Co-author of Valley of the Birdtail: An Indian Reserve, a White Town, and the Road to Reconciliation
46:16
Qlaw Pod - Episode 54 -Gender and the Law of Husband and Wife
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
We are pleased to have Professor Jim Phillips, one of Canada's, and the world's, leading legal historians visit us. Professor Phillips will provide general remarks on the field of legal history before exploring the subjects addressed by his recent book: the law governing married women in the later nineteenth century as well as the operation of the civil courts, the forensic skills of leading members of the Ontario legal profession, constitutional law, and parliamentary divorce during this time.
58:38
Qlaw Pod - Episode 53 -End-of-Life Law Fireside Chat
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
Title: End-of-Life Online Fireside Chat
Date: Monday, December 8, 2025
Description: On Monday, December 8, we held a free online Fireside Chat on End-of-Life Law. Dean Colleen Flood was joined by Alexandra Manthorpe (Partner, Cunningham Swan), Leanne Kaufman (President and CEO RBC Royal Trust) and Dr. David Freedman (Associate Professor, Queen’s Law) for an important panel discussion on End-of-Life Law & Planning. Covering important areas, such as Wills, Trust, and Estates, this panel is intended to de-mystify the legal implications around planning for End-of-Life.
If you are interested in learning more about End-of-Life learn more about our session that we are running in early January. - https://law.queensu.ca/programs/end-of-life
Speakers:
Colleen M. Flood - Dean, Queen's Faculty of Law
Alexandra Manthorpe, Law'10 - Partner, Cunningham Swan
Leanne Kaufman, Law'96 - President and CEO RBC Royal Trust
Dr. David Freedman - Associate Professor, Queen’s Faculty of Law
01:28:47
Qlaw Pod - Episode 51 - FLSQ - Garnet Families: Creating a research ecosystem centering defence and public safety...
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
Title: FLSQ - Garnet Families: Creating a research ecosystem centering defence and public safety families
Date: Monday, November 10, 2025
Description: In 2022, Dr. Cramm consolidated her research program under the interdisciplinary and international Families Matter Research Group (FMRG) (https://garnetfamilies.com/fmrg/). The concept of “Garnet families” has become a unifying framework for the group’s research, network and partnership activities.
Garnet families experience a unique combination of lifestyle factors — risks, identities, logistics and mobility — that interact dynamically throughout the life course. Most members of the FMRG team have personal connections to Garnet families, viewing their research as a form of service to that community. These connections deepen their commitment and provide insights that enrich the work.
Dr. Cramm serves as project director for the SSHRC-funded Garnet Families Partnership (2024–31), an international collaboration among Garnet families and those who study, serve and support them. Using a collective impact approach, the partnership aims to strengthen networks, expand knowledge and build capacity.
Speakers:
Dr. Heidi Cramm - Professor in the School of Rehabilitation Queen’s University
01:00:41
Qlaw Pod - Episode 52 - Unreasonably hypothetical: what’s wrong with s.12
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
Title: Unreasonably hypothetical: what’s wrong with s.12
Date: Monday, November 17, 2025
Description: Proportionality in punishment is deeply uncertain. Even when people agree on facts and values, they often reach different but reasonable conclusions about appropriate sentences. Against this backdrop, the Supreme Court of Canada’s reliance on “reasonable hypotheticals” to strike down mandatory minimums under Section 12 of the Charter is flawed. Abstract principles cannot produce a single correct sentencing outcome. The Court’s use of “reasonable hypotheticals” obscures the comparative reasoning behind sentencing in a common law system and replaces democratic accountability with judicial intuition.
Speakers:
Vincent Chiao - Professor and Associate Dean, Graduate Programs, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law
38:16
QLawPod- Episode 50 - The Open Court Principle and the Use of NDAs in Air Passenger Complaints
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
Title: The Open Court Principle and the Use of NDAs in Air Passenger Complaints
Date: Thursday, November 13, 2025
Description: This talk examines efforts by airlines and the federal government to limit passengers and the media from discussing legally binding decisions in air passenger complaints, including the reasons and evidence behind them.
Openness in judicial and quasi-judicial proceedings is a right protected by the Charter. That right has come under pressure in recent years, not only through airlines’ use of non-disclosure agreements with passengers, but also through a 2023 amendment to the Canada Transportation Act. The amendment imposes confidentiality on evidence, reasons and decisions in air passenger complaints, preventing passengers from discussing how their cases were resolved. The provision is now the subject of a Charter challenge.
Speakers:
Dr. Gábor Lukács - President | Air Passenger Rights
51:17
QLawPod- Episode 49 - From Silence to Systems Change: Collective Strategies to End Femicide and Gender-Based Violence
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
Title: FLSQ - From Silence to Systems Change: Collective Strategies to End Femicide and Gender-Based Violence
Date: Monday, September 29, 2025
Description: Every 48 hours in Canada, a woman, girl or gender-diverse person is killed in an act of femicide. This lecture examines gender-based violence (GBV) prevention locally in Ottawa, nationally across Canada and internationally within movements to end femicide. It will explore systemic barriers rooted in colonialism and exclusion, alongside new strategies for coordination, accountability and community-led change. Drawing on Ottawa’s three-year GBV Action Plan, the session highlights bold, community-driven approaches to ending femicide.
Speakers:
Astara van der Jagt - Director of Programs, Ottawa Coalition to End Violence Against Women (OCTEVAW); Founder/CEO, EquiShift
44:17
QLawPod- Episode 48 - Safer Spaces, Stronger Selves: Gender Justice in Housing and Human Security
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
Title: FLSQ - Safer Spaces, Stronger Selves: Gender Justice in Housing and Human Security
Date: Monday, September 22, 2025
Description: The word “homelessness” seldom comes to mind when thinking of women fleeing violence. But rising housing insecurity and overlapping housing crises are creating gender-specific risks. This talk will share research underway through the interdisciplinary Quebec Homelessness Prevention Policy Collaborative, and its legal reform project that uses a human rights-based approach to law to drive social change.
Speakers:
Pearl Eliadis - Associate Professor (professional), Max Bell School of Public Policy; Full Member, Centre for Human Rights and legal pluralism, Faculty of Law, McGill University
55:41
QLawPod- Episode 47 - Navigating a career in the banking and financial sector
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
Title: Law'80 Careers in Business Law Panel - Navigating a career in the banking and financial sector
Date: Monday, October 20, 2025
Description: Queen’s Faculty of Law and the Corporate Law Club are pleased to showcase the annual Law'80 Careers in Business Law Panel. This year’s Q&A will focus on navigating a career in the banking and financial sector. Hear from three lawyers on the opportunities and challenges in this area of law.
Speakers:
Sam DiGiuseppe, Law'22 - Associate, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
Alice Abbott, Law'88, MBA'96 - Formerly Global General Counsel, GPS Capital Markets
Erica Young, B.Comm’08 - Assistant Vice President and Senior Counsel, Canada Life
56:22
QLaw Pod - Episode 46 - Virginia Torres: Thirteen Economies, One Country
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
Thirteen Economies, One Country: How the Highest Court Undermined a National Canadian Economy
Canada is one country, but economically it is a patchwork of 13 regional economies. Interprovincial trade barriers cost billions in lost productivity and innovation. As federal and provincial governments work to dismantle these internal walls, the question remains: why do they exist and why have they persisted?
The roots of Canada’s fragmented market lie not only in politics or provincial protectionism, but also in constitutional interpretation. Confederation’s framers envisioned a strong federal role in commerce, but the Supreme Court narrowed federal trade powers and expanded provincial authority over property and civil rights.
This lecture explores how judicial choices shaped Canada’s patchwork economy, why past decisions are difficult to overcome, and why today offers the best chance in generations to build a freer national market.
53:20
QLawPod - Episode 45 - 150th Anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada Celebration
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
The Supreme Court of Canada: The first 150 years
Since its establishment in 1875, the role of the Supreme Court of Canada has undergone a series of fundamental changes. The lecture will describe these changes, leading up to the current role of the court in the Charter era.
Speakers
The Honourable Malcolm Rowe
Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada
01:06:15
Episode 44: Transforming Justice - A Crime to Rhyme: Race, Rap, and the Criminal Legal System
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
Title: Transforming Justice - A Crime to Rhyme: Race, Rap, and the Criminal Legal System
Date: Friday, May 16, 2025. This podcast was recorded from a panel that was held virtually as part of the 14th Annual Critical Perspectives Conference “Transforming Justice,” hosted by University of Victoria.
Description: In May 2025, Professor Lisa M. Kelly, Ms. Afsheen Chowdhury (Law’24) and Mr. Lamar Skeete joined in a virtual conversation for the 14th Annual Critical Perspectives Conference, “Transforming Justice,” hosted by University of Victoria. Their panel – A Crime to Rhyme: Race, Rap, and the Criminal Legal System – discussed the controversial practice of using rap lyrics to secure criminal convictions. Each year, Prof. Kelly teaches Mr. Skeete’s case – R. v. Skeete (Ontario Court of Appeal, 2017) – in her Evidence course where students consider what happens when art is put on trial. In this conversation across prison walls, Kelly, Chowdhury, and Skeete discuss racial bias, systemic injustice, and the transformative power of education and community between prison and the academy.
Speakers:
Lisa Kelly, Associate Professor, Queen's Law
Afsheen Chowdhury, Law'24
Lamar Skeete
57:45
Episode 43: Marcus-Matalon Lecture on US Law with Akhil Reed Amar
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
Title: Marcus-Matalon Lecture on U.S. Law - The US Constitution as the Law of the Land: Maps, Militaries, and the Mississippi - Akhil Reed Amar
Date: Friday, March 21, 2025
Description: Explore U.S. constitutional geography, indivisibility and neighbouring borders in this preview of the book Born Equal: Remaking America's Constitution, 1840-1920, in this year’s Marcus-Matalon Lecture.
Speakers:
Akhil Reed Amar, Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science, Yale University
Stephen Marcus, Principal at the Marcus Firm, PLLC
Mohamed Khimji, David Allgood Professor in Business Law; Professor Queen's Law
59:14
Episode 42: Visiting Speaker Thomas Isaac - Emerging Issues in Aboriginal Law
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
Title: Visiting Speaker Thomas Isaac - Emerging Issues in Aboriginal Law
Date: Friday, March 17, 2025
Description: Explore Aboriginal title, Métis rights and the honour of the Crown in an in-depth look at Thomas Isaac's new sixth edition of Aboriginal Law.
Speakers:
Thomas Isaac, Partner, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP; Chair, Aboriginal Law Group
Cherie Metcalf, Associate Dean (Research), Professor, Queen's Law
45:19
Episode 41: Samuel Issacharoff - Emergencies, Alien and Domestic
Episode in
Queen's Faculty of Law: QLaw Pod
Title: The J.A. Corry Lecture with Samuel Issacharoff - An event to honour the life and work of Professor Alvin Cheung - Emergencies, Alien and Domestic
Date: Friday, March 7, 2025
Description: An old saying has it that war is bad for liberty but good for democracy. In exchange for support to face an external threat and the suspension of rights during wartime, citizens are often rewarded with greater political liberties post conflict. In contrast, responses to domestic “enemies” are more threatening to democracies, undermining legitimacy during a crisis and eroding rights in the aftermath. These themes are considered in light of emerging populist challenges to democracy.
Speakers:
Samuel Issacharoff, Reiss Professor of Constitutional Law, New York University School of Law
Cherie Metcalf, Associate Dean (Research), Professor, Queen's Law
Alyssa King, Assistant Professor, Queen's Law
59:59
You may also like View more
Black Mango Podcast
En este podcast te contamos todo lo que siempre quisiste saber!
Historia, crímenes y por supuesto aventuras! Updated
El Canal del Coronel
CANAL OFICIAL. El análisis geopolítico del Coronel Pedro Baños.
El mundo no es como te lo cuentan.
En este podcast, el Coronel Pedro Baños desvela las claves ocultas de la geopolítica, los intereses reales de las grandes potencias y las estrategias que están redefiniendo el orden mundial.
Conflictos, guerras, economía, inteligencia y poder global explicados de forma clara, directa y sin filtros.
Si quieres entender qué está pasando realmente —y qué pasará en el futuro— este podcast es para ti. Updated
ROCA PROJECT
Un Podcast para personas que buscan inspiración, aprendizaje y crecimiento personal. En Roca Project, Carlos Roca pone el foco en el valor humano conversando, sin filtros y en profundidad, con expertos, personajes influyentes y personas anónimas con una historia impactante que contar. Si buscas un podcast que te entretenga pero que además te aporte valor, este es tu podcast. Todos los miércoles a las 19:30 horas. Updated






















